If so, then what did you do to resolve this For me, i never knew whether it was accep. Actually, there's more to this than mentioned in some other answers The word that is a subordinator It is not a relative word like who, where, when, or which Even in integrated relative clauses, they are not always interchangeable
When the relative construction follows a fronted preposition, only relative words will do, so relative pronoun which is available, but that isn't He will understand that i was not joking He will understand i was not joking Which of the sentences is correct Are there any specific rules about the use of "that" I would like to know if you can use that with a comma after it
Hello, drflash55, and welcome to english language & usage Your answer seems to be heavily weighted toward personal opinion as opposed to objective analysis—but this site especially prizes answers that have an identifiable basis in verifiable fact rather than just opinion Please consider strengthening your answer by citing some independent authority that draws the same general conclusion. For the past few years, i have been hearing people say "that tracks," My search on green's dictionary of slang yielded nothing with this clear meani. I just received a proofread version of an academic manuscript from my copy editor
She essentially changed all of the instances in which i had written given that to given. i've tried to read up. That said, the game is over That having been said, the game is over That being said, the game is over Both your examples are grammatical However, that may be omitted from this kind of relative clause when, as in your examples, it is the object
It’s important to learn the difference between the present participle (confusing) and the past participle (confused). The following sentence was on one of the tests What would you like to do that others have told you is impossible Students have asked why that could not be replaced with what
OPEN
