Probably a rare occurrence, though. It could be that the leaky cauldron is invisible to muggles, or, it could simply be that the leaky cauldron appears so uninteresting, when compared with everything surrounding it, that it's as if muggles can't see it. It has rarely been mentioned since harry’s first time through, but presumably wizards need to pass through it any time they travel between the leaky cauldron and the rest of diagon alley It’s interesting that magic is required to pass through it when it seems muggles can’t see the leaky cauldron to begin with (ps5). The leaky cauldron was a popular wizarding pub and inn located in london It was the entrance to diagon alley and, indirectly, knockturn alley
In the first book we learn that only wizards and witches can see the leaky cauldron And yet, in the second book we see hermione’s parents at gringotts, the leaky cauldron, and flourish and blotts In the movie we also see them at f&b I’ve always wondered.muggles don’t see any of that How’re the grangers supposed to see it then? Jennifer slone weasleys whimsical world of harry potter mar 31 if muggles can’t see the sign for the leaky cauldron what do they think is there
Wilson from the first book, chapter 5 “this is it,” said hagrid, coming to a halt,
OPEN
