He is one of those rare people, and he believes in ancient myths. As an alternative for a face to face confrontation and in interviews (quite often political ones on tv). You can say not one of them (meaning not even a single one of them), or none of them, or possibly neither of them (if only two people are involved) No one of them is not grammatical. As for the suggested longer expression jack of all trades, master of none, but better than a master of one, the earliest matches i could find for it are two instances from 2007 From drum magazine (2007) [combined snippets]
The full phrase is actually jack of all trades, master of none, though ofttimes better than master of one . When usage and logic clash (along the lines of more than one person has said) We often hear this phrase, but how can people (meaning 'the plural of person') take a singular verb Would you prefer an alternate way of saying this, such as one person or more [this sounds quite awkward to. Has someone seen my bag
Which one is grammatically correct and why Which one should i use at this place Can you give some more examples? The versions in blue are equal to 185 centimeters, and the versions in red are equal to 211 centimeters Please be careful about what you really mean [/quote] i just realized and you're right
I meant six foot one and, therefore, 6'1, not 6'11 I just wanted to know if it was better to write 6'1 or six foot one in an essay. One hundred and one 234,500 Two hundred and thirty four thousand five hundred based on my experience, britons, australians and new zealanders say the and, and north americans do not (ie one hundred one, etc) I believe most other english speaking countries say the and Which version was used first?
As soon as i moved to secondary school, where we had more than one class in each year group, each class was known by a number (for the year) and a letter.
OPEN
